How do I love God and not a product? This is a very important question
for those of us who live in the modern West, we who are deprived of organic
culture and saturated in a materialist outlook. Those who are not content with
what the world gives them are unfortunately by necessity forced to ground
themselves in something of their own choosing: religion, philosophy, lifestyle
etc. The problem this creates in the Catholic realm is that of a devotion to
certain positions (liberal, traditional), schools (Thomistic, Nouvelle Theologie),
or forms of liturgical praxis. As long as one assents to certain propositions
of a system they have all they need, what goes along with this is usually a strong
sentimental attachment to things that accidentally go along with the system,
anything else is suspect or downright anathema.
These points of view are elegantly marketed to us in the form of religious products, and it seems like we have to subscribe to one of these endlessly multiplying products in order to be a “good” Catholic. We are no longer just consumers of goods, but now ideas and lifestyles are advertised and consumed in the same manner. Every package seems to think that it’s got it all. I think this phenomenon is inevitable in our individually driven society, but it’s a view that I think can be broken out of slowly.
Having been a devotee to a number of religious products in my life I have come to realize the inadequacy of all of them. Viewing everything through a specified system will inevitably blind you to some aspects of the truth that are better looked at from another perspective; and even worse than that, it will misplace your love. Once you realize that whatever Catholic brand you subscribed to wasn’t all that and actually misses the mark a lot of the time there can be the temptation just to leave altogether.
A benefit of having a wide breadth of knowledge is that you can see
systems and perspectives in their proper place, As Rene Guenon so often pointed
out, the greatest danger of a systematic worldview is that it has the tendency
to exclude the possibility of any other forms of knowledge.
Understanding what you can’t know from a particular point of view will lead you
closer to the truth. I don’t know how people can spin their wheels in specific
perspective their whole lives.
It has been through honestly trying to understand Eastern religion and
philosophy that I have made progress in moving past a worship of a religious
product to come closer to the Truth itself who transcends all systems. This is
not a syncretic approach – it does not exclude the idea that some traditions
and systems are more pure than others – but it is the Catholic approach that we
see in action in St. Thomas who apprehended and synthesized truth whether it
was found in Islamic, Pagan, Platonist, or Christian sources. When truth is
understood in this universal manner, sentimental attachments grow less, and so
do the unnecessary divisions which we draw between one another.
Reflecting upon Eastern thought has been a humbling experience: to
discover that there is true wisdom in utterly foreign civilizations that you
are not equipped to understand really gives you pause. If men in India and
China centuries before Christ could come to some knowledge of God and produce
great spiritual men, who am I to think that my personalized modern religious
product is the be all end all of spirituality? Also, Since I
lack the proper knowledge and methods for examining Eastern modes of thought
I’ve entirely had to rely on other people, I can’t bs my way through Adi
Shankara. This too is a humbling experience.
Most importantly, this study has caused me to think much more on what is
at the heart of Catholicism. Unfortunately, it is easy to get lost in
particulars and regard them as what we are aiming at instead of God. Since
Catholicism and Eastern religions have little accidentally in common, my mind
is then primarily focused on the greater themes of both: God, love, beauty,
humanity, and so on. You can’t focus on issues of liturgical minutiae when
engaging with Hinduism, such pointless discussions simply makes no sense in
that context, the mind must be led higher. In a paradoxical way it is easier to
grasp higher truths than more contingent ones, it is harder to keep up with the
politics and material contingencies of any faith than to explore the core
doctrines, this is because the doctrines are more metaphysical/universal and
therefore simpler and more constant. After raising my mind in the attempt to
understand the doctrines the Eastern civilizations I can then resume this
exercise with greater clarity in the context of my own tradition. Not that my
survey of Eastern philosophy has turned me into a pure contemplative, but it
has at least reoriented my mind a little more towards the good.
This method is certainly not for everyone, as reading Eastern philosophy
is not going to help one who is not at least a bit intellectually inclined,
neither will it profit people who are prone to flitting between religion after
religion. But for those who are more intellectually minded and firm in their
faith, who feel a dissatisfaction with the various forms of Catholic products
being peddled, a read through of the Bhagavad Gita, or the Tao Te Ching might
help in gaining a faith that is more authentic and honest.
No comments:
Post a Comment